產(chǎn)品詳情
型號
:駐店2098-DSD-150-SE羅克韋爾AB伺服驅(qū)動器價格
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV220X-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV220-SE |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV150 |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV100-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV050X-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV050X |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV050-SE |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV030X-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV030X |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV030-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-HV030 |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-150-SE |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-075X |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-075-SE |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-075 |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-030X-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-030X |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-030-SE |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-030 |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-020X-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-020-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-020 |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-010X |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-010 |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-005X-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-005X |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-005-DN |
Allen Bradley | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-005 |
ALLEN BRADLEY | 2098-DSD-010X-DN | |
Allen Bradley | 2098-DSD-020X | |
ALLEN BRADLEY | 2098-DSD-HV150-SE | |
ALLEN BRADLEY | 2098-DSD-HV100-SE | |
ALLEN BRADLEY | 2098-DSD-005-SE | |
ALLEN BRADLEY | 2098-DSD-HV030-SE | |
ALLEN BRADLEY | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-020-SE |
ALLEN BRADLEY | 伺服驅(qū)動器 | 2098-DSD-010-SE |
:駐店2098-DSD-150-SE羅克韋爾AB伺服驅(qū)動器價格利簋銘文分別記載武王征商與成王賜右史利銅兩件史事,由于學(xué)界長期以來受"生稱王謚"說的影響,混淆了利簋銘文中的"珷"和"王"兩者的關(guān)系,從而將利簋視作武王世作器。文獻(xiàn)資料與青銅器銘文表明,周王從不自稱王,更不會自稱王號;而臣下對周王的稱呼,對先王則稱"謚號",對時王則但稱"王",并不存在"生稱王號"的情況。在西周金文中,稱名的體例相當(dāng)嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),這是因?yàn)楣糯鐣校质冀K是重要的價值取向,周王的名號更是如此。所謂"生稱王謚"諸器的紀(jì)年方式,由于是追述先王事跡,銘文紀(jì)年必然要考慮先王相對于時王的時空關(guān)系,所以不能出現(xiàn)"唯王某年"的格式,目的正是在于避免與時王相混淆。利簋銘文中的"珷"和"王",系分別指武王和成王。利簋的"辛未"紀(jì)日,不會是武王甲子牧野之戰(zhàn)后的第七日,而應(yīng)屬成王紀(jì)時。利的身份應(yīng)是右史而非有司。利簋銘文記述成王親自對利進(jìn)行賞賜,所以利簋鑄造的時間更有可能在成王親政以后。